Pitforthie Horseshoe

FEATUREDLOCAL HISTORY

Alan O'Neill

8/11/20244 min read

Image of a horseshoe
Image of a horseshoe

Some years ago I found a horseshoe in my garden. Given the history of our property and its role as a central focus for the Lands of Pitforthie, near Brechin, that might not be surprising. The shoe was left on an old tree stump for some years following, until a chance discussion on the golf course with a “senior golfer” who is very keen on local history and metal detecting. We started a conversation about horseshoes and would it be possible to date or find out about horseshoe history. This post is the result of that conversation and my thanks to you, Gordon.

Top – closest to horse hoof

Bottom – contacts the ground

I learned recently that when examining an old horseshoe, there are a few specific details that can give us clues about its age, intended use, and craft:

  • Overall Shape and Size: Heavy, broad draft-horseshoes versus narrower riding or carriage shoes; early medieval shoes tend to be lighter with wavy edges, while post-1600s shoes became thicker and more uniform.

  • Nail Holes (Countersinks): The shape of the holes (rectangular, square, or round) and whether they are counter-punched or seated in a groove.

  • Fullering: Whether there is a continuous groove (fuller) running along the bottom face where the nail heads sit.

  • Heels and Calkins: Folded, thickened, or turned-down ends (calkins) designed for traction on muddy ground or paved roads.

  • Clips: Small raised tabs on the front or sides of the shoe, which became common primarily in the 19th century to relieve strain on the nails.

This has turned into a fascinating post. Whoever knew there was so much to a horseshoe? Based on the physical features shown in both the ground-facing view and the foot-facing view there are a number of things the shoe can tell us:

Key Features and Physical Evidence

  • Heavy Toe Grab / Toe Bar: The most distinct feature is the thick, raised bar welded or forged onto the ground surface at the toe in the first image. This acted as a heavy toe-grab or cleat designed to give the horse intense traction, typical for heavy draft, agricultural, or heavy haulage horses pulling working loads on soft earth, stone, or mud.

  • Pronounced Calkins (Heels): The heel ends are turned down into thick, square calkins. Combined with the heavy toe grab, this elevated the entire shoe off the ground surface, providing substantial grip and levelling the horse's stance on rough ground. Early modern shoes (1600s–1700s) used folded heels or simple turned calkins, but heavy, thick-welded toe grabs and squared calkins were developed in the late 19th century specifically for heavy draft work on paved roads or wet agricultural soil.

  • Toe Clip (Foot Side): Looking at the “top” image, there is a distinct triangular toe clip turned up at the front edge of the shoe. Toe clips were designed to fit against the outer hoof wall to keep the shoe from sliding backward under heavy draft forces. Prior to the early 1800s, toe clips were practically non-existent on British horseshoes. Their widespread adoption began in the mid-19th century to relieve stress on nail holes when heavy horses pulled massive loads.

  • Creased / Fullered Nail Channels: The bottom side has deep fullering (creasing) with distinct square/rectangular nail holes seated within the groove. Machine-punched and heavily fullered (grooved) channels with uniform rectangular nail holes became standard industrial manufacturing and blacksmith practice in the second half of the 19th century.

  • Symmetry and Proportions: The shoe is wide, thick, and relatively symmetrical with broad web width, built to support a large, heavy foot.

Age Estimation and Context

  • Estimated Era: Likely late 19th century to early 20th century (approx. 1880s–1930s).

  • Why not earlier? 17th-century horseshoes were generally lighter, thinner, lacked toe clips, and relied on different nail hole styles (like wide counter-sunk "wavy-edged" shoes or plain flat shoes with simple folded heels). Integrated toe clips and structured fullered toe-grab bars became standard blacksmithing techniques in the mid-to-late 19th century as heavy industrial and farm transport peaked.

  • Intended Use: This horseshoe was almost certainly fitted to a heavy draft horse (such as a Clydesdale or similar working breed) used for agricultural ploughing or pulling heavy carts/dray wagons. The extreme traction features (toe grab and high calkins) were specifically crafted for heavy pull work where slipping meant a total loss of power.

Without a doubt this is a fantastic piece of local working history, probably lost or discarded during routine re-shoeing right on the property or during garden / field work a century ago. When picking the horseshoe up I was struck by its weight given its size – its heavy. But that makes sense given its construction. It was forged from thick, solid wrought iron (or heavy steel) to withstand immense pressure. A draft horseshoe like this often weighs roughly double or triple the weight of a standard modern saddle-horse shoe.

A few specific elements explain that weight:

  • Solid Toe Bar and Heavy Calkins: The thick bar added to the front toe and the heavy, squared heels add a substantial amount of extra mass right where the shoe takes the most wear.

  • Broad Web: The metal bar stock used by the blacksmith was kept wide and thick to protect the large sole of a heavy working horse, rather than trimmed down for agility.

  • Wrought Iron Density: Older blacksmith-forged iron from that era is dense, layered metal built to handle the gruelling, repetitive strain of a 1,000 kg (one-ton) working horse hauling heavy farm machinery or loaded wagons through thick mud and clay.

Historical and Archaeological References

Sparkes, Ivan G. (1976). Stagecoaches and Horseshoes. Shire Publications.

Chugg, John (2001). Horseshoes: A Pocket Guide for Identification. Shire Album 342.

Dicken, E. R. H. (Museum of English Rural Life (MERL) Archive & Artifact Collections. Accessed August 2026. Dicken, E.R.H. (horseshoe collector) - The Museum of English Rural Life

Noël Hume, Ivor (1969). A Guide to Artifacts of Colonial America.

(c) 2026